The Meeting Tree

Operations · 02

Who We Speak To

Write for these profiles. They are working profiles: describe what is known, never invent audience detail.

Primary · Thoughtful Pair / Circle of Friends

Working hypothesis
What they need
Cultural context. · Strong journey point of view. · Meaningful shared time. · Food, craft, architecture, and human connection. · Good pace. · Confidence in logistics.
Proof to include
Why the destination or season matters. · Itinerary arc. · Specific moments. · Partner credibility. · Small-group rationale. · Practical clarity.
CTA focus
Awareness and consideration CTAs; one CTA per item.
Avoid
Rushed checklists · Crowded formulaic tours · Generic destination content · Spectacle · Status language

Secondary · Intentional Group Organiser

Working hypothesis
What they need
Shared travel without logistical chaos. · Visible planning process. · Coherence and pace. · Clarity on what The Meeting Tree handles.
Proof to include
Planning process. · Group-fit questions. · Scope of what The Meeting Tree handles. · Pace and concierge support. · Permissioned referral / client proof.
CTA focus
Consideration and conversion CTAs; discovery conversation.
Avoid
Managing every decision themselves · Logistical chaos · Ambiguous scope

Tertiary · Connected Family / Multigenerational Traveller

Research required
What they need
Not yet researched — family-specific service evidence required.
Proof to include
Founder-approved family-specific claims only.
CTA focus
No paid targeting before research is complete.
Avoid
Unapproved family or accessibility claims.